Tuesday’s episode of Dr. Phil featured two guests sparring over a debate surrounding whether humans should be implanting microchips in their body.
“Surgically implanting computers into humans is dangerous. Just how dangerous? We don’t know yet, because that’s how they release technology,” A critic of microchip implants calling himself “R” said in his introduction.
He went on to say humans who get microchips implanted in them would likely learn far too late about their risks of the technology.
“As long as it doesn’t kill you instantly or almost instantly, it’s deemed safe for sale. And then it’s 5, 10, 20 years later we learn that it causes cancer, autism, birth defects, and more,” R said. “But by that point we’ve become so dependent on the technology we choose to live with the disease.”
A critic of microchipping humans offered his opinions on an episode of Dr. Phil.
PEOPLE SHOULD ‘PASS A TEST’ TO PROVE THEY’RE ‘INCOME-WORTHY’ OF HAVING KIDS, DR. PHIL GUEST ARGUES
R suggested technology inside of one’s body is a dangerous new field of study.
“But these exposures, these are crazy. We’re talking about literally inside the body, point-blank range with zero distance day in day out for years on end. What impact will that have? We don’t know. But I can tell you it won’t be good,” he said.
In Dr. Phil’s studio, founder and CEO of VivoKey Technologies, Amal Graafstra, pushed back against R’s claims.
“I think we can just nip this all in the bud right now because these devices are passive. That means when they’re not in the seconds of exposure of a very low frequency, low power field, they’re dead. They’re inert. They have no energy whatsoever,” he said.
R asked, “What does having that chip in your body for 20 years do on average to a population of 20,000 people?”
Graafstra responded, “Nothing. We’ve used this exact material since the ’70s. There’s been almost zero evidence of any kind of irritation.”
June 4,…